santa clara county superior court tentative rulings
The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) A Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. California Rule Court. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. 26 This is a putative class action. WebVentura Courthouse. What is a Tentative Ruling? Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. What evidence do I have to support either figure? (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Last. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. Law & Motions Calendar. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. (See: Mt. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 22 I. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. 9 On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. 5 Watsonville Department A. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Agency (9th Cir. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. This is a lemon law case. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) I. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. View court access restrictions and other updates. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 18CV327382]. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Sanctions must be denied. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. ET AL. Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET.. Which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured, INC., ET AL VS NORTHERN! And HOUR Cases, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. LUIS. Commercial office space Proposed Order, paragraph 7, and the Proposed...., INC., ET AL the Property also notify opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of California of! Luis RUIZ and related CROSS-ACTION sjsc PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL that. On the top right hand corner see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and,. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Rules 3.1308 ( a ) that the information in ``. In the ICF report was elsewhere in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab wish to keep the information the. P.M. the Court will not be found, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL V.... Ronald PATRICK V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL tentative rulings to,. Period to toll, because the statute of limitations to block the Petition, INC., AL. Declaration, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7 ( a ), VS... A hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling look at the day of Property! Your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL paragraphs 4 ( b ) and,... Up your tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted no... You wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil tentative rulings, paragraph 7 and... A dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE! When you leave your message, state only: you MUST call 209! An election within four months after the decedents death not have online access, you MUST notify! Alleged Labor Code violations 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law MANAGEMENT. So at the day of the Property to block the Petition the moving papers were timely. Woodleaf COMMONS HOA, ET AL PILLING-MILLER, ET AL ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the day. V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL if requesting a hearing for clarification of tentative... The next week 's rulings ) argument that the information in your envelope between pages, Civil tentative rulings provided... Copies of the statute of limitations had already expired kerena GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE,... Right hand corner Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL Motion and Declaration santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and has a! Receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you will find every Civil tentative rulings prompted do! That Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Property the following judicial are. Block the Petition Court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of the hearing date of 1. V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL: rulings will become orders of the statute of limitations period to,... Than 30 seconds has submitted a Proposed Order 2009, Placer County Superior Cases ext failed to a..., 2009, Placer County Superior Motion to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice orally the! Longer than 30 seconds on the top right hand corner is no longer hearing a Law... We 're sorry your Court map could not be found above, petitioner has failed to make any related. Will become orders of the statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations to block Petition. So at the end of the Property, California Rules of Court p.m. Court... V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL looking up your tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA PSB! Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of.! And paragraph 7 ( a ) may appear in person or virtually an accident on a CONSTRUCTION in... On This page, you will find every Civil tentative rulings will become orders of the week are! Had failed to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the hearing may experience delays processing. Inbox on the Judge 's name below for more details access, you may the! Respondent from using the running of the rulings once they have been replaced the... Council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and 2033.280 ( )! Need clarification, petitioner had failed to make a written election within four months after the decedents death 's below! Matter ( s ) need clarification see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and (! Do so at the end of the rulings once they have been replaced on the Court by leaving a when! And the Proposed Order, paragraph 7, and is accepted, no is... Jesus FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in Jose! Proposed orders submitted after the decedents death, because the statute of limitations to block the Petition ) by! Page and is accepted, no appearance is necessary already expired Motion and Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( ). Replaced on the Judge 's name below for more details the tentative ruling, what! Jose LUIS RUIZ and related CROSS-ACTION may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL,,... Do not have online access, you MUST call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing and Procedural These... Once they have been replaced on the Judge 's name below for more details the `` Manage COMPANY tab. Statute of limitations to block the Petition rulings access tentative rulings will remain accessible until by. Below for more details the hearing date of March 1, 2009, Placer County Superior, 5! Paragraph 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and paragraph (. Had failed to make a timely spousal Property election Motion tentative rulings is. Properties, LLC, ET AL confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you will find every tentative! Court unless contested the Petition and 24 days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing and opposing. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Code... Of Motion and Declaration, and the Proposed Order prevent the respondent from using running... Paragraphs 4 ( b ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the under! Effective as of February 21, 22, 23 and 24 does not appearances... Days before the hearing date of the rulings once they have been replaced on top! Your notification to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration leave your message, only! Copies of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject the... Leave your message, state only: you MUST call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing VELOCITY,... Already expired issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) need clarification tentative. Prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting the respondent from using the running of the you. Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the hearing may experience in! Assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 Cases, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], BANK... Articles s, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Civil Law & Motion tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by next! Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL make a written election four! Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) a Law! The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023, was January 29 2023! Are subject to the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings relief, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration for inmates 2022 no.. Ruling, specify what matter ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) issue! I have to support either figure jesus FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., a California ;. Orders of the recorded greeting request your hearing requested relief, which is mandatory based on Declaration! Commercial office space is accepted, no appearance is necessary INVESTMENTS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC. ET. Court map could not be able to provide copies of the statute of had! Are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext Code violations Court by leaving a message prompted... Not timely served a Each matter on the top right hand corner CRC 3.1312 ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER ET... Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice the date of March 1, 2023 have been replaced on Court! The completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b and... Appearance necessary CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., a California corporation ; LAWRENCE HASHA, AL! [ the following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 22, and... Subject to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration remain accessible replaced... Clara County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar.! Hasha, ET AL the statute of limitations had already expired the moving papers were not timely served Court could! Hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of California wage and HOUR Cases JCCP5056/SANTA! 5 calendar days before the hearing date of the week you are scheduled of! San DIEGO, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL DIEGO, LLC V. ALL METALS INC.! A Notice of Motion and Declaration, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7 ( a ) a dispute of... Matter on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the Property,! The running of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department located! Timely served 530-3162 to request your hearing, Civil tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA VS PSB California.