example of perjury by inconsistent statements

Posted: 14. 04. 2023 | Author: | Category: kobe last words before he died

Where, by contrast, the testimony being challenged has some but lesser importance and the witness is not highly antagonistic, it is better to defer the impeachment until a flow has been established, the witness is comfortable with the cross-examiner because the questioning has not been hostile, and the impeachment can be spun as just the clearing up of a mistake. 5104, accessed May 8, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/crimes-and-offenses/00.051.004.000.html. The defense was doing a great job with this theme and there seemed to be some reasonable doubt. Ohios perjury statute defines material as something that could affect the course or outcome of the proceeding. The U.S. Supreme Court defined it, in Kungys v. United States, as a statement that has a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the decision of the decision-making body to which it was addressed.(internal quotation marks omitted). The statement may be served as part of the statement of damages required by Code of Civil Procedure section 425.11. Penal Law 195.10, accessed May 7, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0195.10_195.10.html. Susannah, a Hollywood movie star, is a witness in a civil personal injury case. 575.040, 2011). The first type of perjury involves statements made under oath, and requires proof that: The second type of perjury involves unsworn statements, and requires proof that: State laws defining perjury are generally similar to the federal statute. Many jurisdictions provide a defense to perjury if the defendant retracts his or her false statement in the course of the same proceeding in which it was made before it becomes manifest that the falsification will be exposed. It's a two-pronged criminal offense requiring inducement by one person, and then perjury by another. Thus Marcus is probably not subject to prosecution for and conviction of perjury, based on his testimony in this case. In the book, the author wrote that under no circumstances should an agent or technician testify a certain way because it was not backed by science. In spite of the attendant circumstance requirement that the statement be made under oath, many jurisdictions disallow a defense to a prosecution for perjury based on the assertion that the oath or affirmation was administered or taken in an irregular manner (Ala. Code 13A-10-108, 2011). If you need the jury to hear a few points from the witness that are helpful to your case first, then save the impeachment for later in the cross-examination. Hence, my preference is to open an examination with the impeachment as a sort of I told you so to the jury when that opportunity presents itself and thereby my credibility as the advocate is reinforced. United Arab Emirates: Contradictory Statements. I do not think it matters if you begin or end your cross with the impeachment or place it chronologically into the story because while the classic answer is it depends, I think the real answer is that you can place it anywhere, so long as you have the permission from the jury to do so. Although Marcus tried to procure Janelle to commit perjury, with specific intent or purposely, Janelle did not cooperate and did not commit the perjury. Penal Law 200.00, 2011; N.Y. For example, if the witness provides a false statement that can hamper or mislead an investigation, it can be charged as perjury. As such, a statement is an assertion that something is or is not the case. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), accessed May 9, 2011, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1853.ZS.html. As a prosecutor, I would have already completed my case-in-chief (and hopefully gained the trust of the jury) before cross-examining any defense witness who may be impeached. The prosecution does not need to prove which statement is false for this offense. Once you establish a pattern of asking short declarative questions, its easier to get concessions. This could be the case if a person lied about his or her age in an application for public benefits based on age, in which case the person might have also committed welfare fraud. Significant inconsistent: include only the inconsistent portion be introduced Silence does not count as inconsistency A . subornation of perjury. Inconsistent statement. Ann. Ann. 1621, 2011). Under Rule 801(d)(1)(A), prior inconsistent statements are not hearsay when the declarant testifies at the trial, is subject to cross-examination, and gave the prior statement under oath subject to perjury. The defense opening was that the case was about love. Marcus's statement was materialbecause, if believed, it would have helped exonerate Lindsay in her civil case. Everything was caught on video. Perhaps these details were important and if they had been delivered in a different order, they would have made more sense and the jury could have bought in more to the defense theory. Marcus made a falsestatement, under a validly administered oath, in a judicialproceeding, with knowledgeof its falsity. Thus, there would be a smooth place to insert the impeachment into the cross examination. Penal Code 38.06, 2011). Figure 13.9 Diagram of Perjury, Bribery, and Obstruction of Justice. This was confusing to me and it had to be to the jury as well. Ga. Code tit. Obstruction of justice takes many forms and is a classic example of an offense against the administration of justice. Ann. Cal. Bribery can also cover members of a state legislature (Cal. 67 Impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement tends to have a negative impact on any rapport established with the witness. The requirement that a false statement is material to the proceeding may be the most important element of perjury. 5A-11, et seq., accessed May 8, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/5a-contempt/index.html. When a state legislator (Cal. Review the example with Marcus in ***Section 13 "Example of Perjury". The crime of perjury is committed by any person who shall knowingly make untruthful statements or make an affidavit, upon any material matter and required by law. The Supreme Court has held that materiality is a question of fact for the jury. 162.265, accessed May 6, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.265.html. When I begin a cross-examination by impeaching the witness, I may adjust the overall order of my cross-examination outline if there is chronological or topical significance to the impeachment point. Is the witness lying? Consider, for example, the holding in Commonwealth v. 13-2807, accessed May 7, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/arizona/criminal-code/13-2807.html. Youve minimized risk by locking in your must-have questions. Not all cross need be cross, and especially if the witness appears vulnerable, likable, or neutral the tone of the impeachment is as critical as the placement. 16, 16-10-70, 2011). Suppose an expert testified that she is neutral and doesn't really know the parties. If done properly, impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement can be very successful to help call the credibility of the witness into question. N.Y. Isabel has most likely committed bribery in this case. Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 465-66 (1997) (discussing materiality of false statements in context of perjury). n. the crime of encouraging, inducing or assisting another in the commission of perjury, which is knowingly telling an untruth under oath. An act of committing such a crime. American Heritage The criminal offense of making false statements under oath, especially in a legal document or during a legal proceeding. Assume for a moment that at trial, on direct examination, the Plaintiff testifies that when he went through the light it was green; however, when the Plaintiff testified during his deposition he testified that he couldnt remember what color the light was. 14-210, 2011). Penal Code 86, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/86.html. Done well, impeachment is exhilarating and one of the most satisfying parts of a trial. In that trial is competitive storyshowing in context, H.T. The recognition of multiple goals of cross-examination is nothing new. Since the direct examination normally leaves the jury with the impressions that the witness is credible, my first phase starts with the goal of bringing out favorable testimony through the witness. And the direct conflict is memorable. Stat. The two are very similar, but false declarations tend to be easier to prove. In fact, it was wrong. 6065, 2011) or a report (Cal. It also might make sense to tie the statement to where it fell chronologically within the case. Certain hearsay statements made by children, under particular circumstances, are also admissible in spite of the hearsay rule.. Perjury is a false statement made under oath before a federal tribunal or official.2 Moreover, some false certifications are punishable as perjury by operation of a federal statute.3 Subornation of perjury is inducing someone else to commit perjury. The reasons for this type of unpredicted impeachable statement are many: the witness is simply nervous or truly forgetful, was not thoroughly prepared, is trying to back pedal, or is a flat out lying. Add to this example and assume that Marcus begs Janelle, another witness in Lindsays conversion trial, to say that she did not see him at Macys the day Lindsay stole the necklace. Fla. Stat. If accused and convicted of committing perjury, a person could face fines and penalties and up to five years in jail . If statement is a prior inconsistent statement given by the declarant under penalty of perjury, then. The crime of bribery is often extended to apply to persons other than public officials, such as employees, agents, or fiduciaries for the purpose of influencing the bribed individuals on-the-job conduct (N.Y. Stat. As stated previously, in many jurisdictions, the defendant must know that a statement is false or must make the statement with the specific intent or purposely to deceive. For example:! The attorney carefully watched the jury members reactions and determined when he had their permission. Penalties for a Perjury Conviction. When an inconsistent statement is elicited on cross-examination, I recommend impeaching the witness right then and there. Perhaps you wait until later in the cross to impeach. It is a public perception that perjury is a hard crime to prove. A prior statement by a declarant-witness that is inconsistent with the declarant-witness's testimony and: (A) was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition; Be sure to follow your impeachment steps to elicit a clear inconsistent statement, not a mush of an answer with cloudy qualifications. Unfortunately, liars in the courtroom may only be caught out by the inconsistent statements they make throughout a case. Does it make our theory of the case (or break theirs), sufficiently undermining the witness testimony or the witness themself, or does it fall somewhere short of that mark? The only question was whether the owners of the dog had actual criminal liability. Cross examination is a controlled conversation, and you are the witness, confirming your story about their story. And if all I want to do is to attack credibility, I save it for phase three. Is it best to, Or is the answer that classic law professor response of it depends? This conundrum was presented to trial advocacy experts nationally; the following is their guidance, the collective wisdom of the trial advocacy academy. In Marcuss criminal perjury by inconsistent statements prosecution, the prosecutor need only offer evidence of the inconsistent statements to the trier of fact. Simpson case was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings. After a trial in the Senate, he was acquitted of both counts and thereafter served out his term as president (Historyplace.com, 2011). 575.040, accessed May 5, 2011, http://www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm. for example, the witness's grand jury testimony, which indicated that the defendant was a marijuana supplier, was . Instead, the jury was on the edge of their seats. Rev. N.Y. Many criminal statutes define bribery as conferring, offering, agreeing to confer, or soliciting, accepting, or agreeing to accept, any benefit upon a public official (criminal act) with the specific intent or purposely, or the general intent or knowingly to form an agreement or understanding that the public officials decision making will be influenced by the benefit. If the witness is lying, what is the motivation to lie? In a sense, a person must make a false statement with an intent to defraud. Penal Law 200.10). If a witness testifies, and is subject to cross-examination, then that witness's prior inconsistent statement is exempted from the hearsay definition, but only if it was made under oath, subject to the penalty of perjury, and made at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition. For me, when you decide to impeach boils down to two things: There is a reason why Ted Talks are 17 minutes long. 575.040(3) (1), accessed May 5, 2011, http://www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm. After the court commissioner administers an oath to tell the truth, Susannah takes the witness stand. The only time that I would start with the impeachment would be if the witness truly has no testimony to offer on cross-examination that are helpful to your side of the case, in which case the entire cross is likely to be an attack on the witnesses credibility. In addition, based on these facts, Isabels connection to the judge is only through her perjury prosecution, so her act appears calculated to influence his decision in that case, especially because the watch is expensive and not merely a token. At The Beginning: If EVERYTHING about this witnesss testimony is just wrong in some fashion, and you need to set the stage for discrediting the lens through which the witness testified, then starting off with some form of impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement, followed by an attack on perception, bias, prejudice, corruption or interest can be very effective. For instance, the statement "The trains are always . Rev. Barry Bonds, a baseball player and record-breaking home run hitter for the San Francisco Giants, was found guilty by a federal jury for obstruction of justice, based on his refusal to answer a question during a grand jury investigation of his steroid use (Macur, J., 2011). He thereafter testifies that he saw Lindsay try on the necklace and then walk out of the store without paying for it. In this example, both the judge and Isabel have likely committed bribery because most states criminalize the conferring, offering, and accepting and receiving a bribe as the criminal act elements. Accordingly, it is necessary to include materiality as an element of the offense in this instruction. Once you decide that, its easier to find the right sequence for the impeachment. Simpson. Rev. The challenge is for the jury and prosecution to find out the truth, the whole . Associate Director of the Center for Advocacy and Dispute Resolution It shall constitute perjury whenever any person, having taken an oath required by law, or made an equivalent affirmation, swears or affirms any fact or state of facts material to the issue or question in controversy; and thereafter in the same or other proceedings, where such matter is material to the issue or question in controversy, swears or However, if the contradiction is substantial, and the fact is meaningful enough even though it was not originally intended to be a part of your story on cross-examination then I would propose that you should include that impeachment only after you are able to elicit those fact, opinions, and conclusions from the witness that are helpful to your case. The falsity of the perjurious statement may be established either by the testimony of two independent witnesses or by one witness and independent corroborating evidence that is inconsistent with the innocence of the accused. Related to DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. For the love, no matter when the inconsistent statement comes in, dont forget to argue the significance of this golden nugget for fact finder. Change this example and assume that the judge in question is an imposter who is merely masquerading as a judge to live out a lifelong fantasy. Most perjury offenses are subject to the possibility of up to five years in . (1) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding that the person has been rehabilitated, and the person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than one year; or Consider whether the witness is mistaken, rather than intentionally dishonest. Example of a Preparatory Crime and Attempt, Voluntary Abandonment as a Defense to Attempt, Example of Voluntary Abandonment as a Defense to Attempt, Example of Attempt and Transferred Intent, Example of a Case Where Whartons Rule Is Inapplicable, LAW AND ETHICS : THE HAN MURDER CONSPIRACY, Renunciation as a Defense to Solicitation, Example of Intent to Cause Serious Bodily Injury, Good News: The US Murder Rate Is Declining, Factors Classifying Murder as First Degree, Definition of Willful, Deliberate, and Premeditated, Example of a Willful, Deliberate, Premeditated Murder, Example of Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Exception to Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Example of the Exception to Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Liability When Someone Other than the Defendant Kills the Victim, Concurrence of the Felony and the Death of the Victim, Example of a Death That Occurs before the Felony Begins, Concurrence of the Killing and the Heat of Passion, Reckless or Negligent Involuntary Manslaughter, Example of Reckless or Negligent Involuntary Manslaughter, Sex Offenses and Crimes Involving Force, Fear, and Physical Restraint, Synopsis of the History of Rape and Sodomy, Proving Lack of Consent as an Attendant Circumstance, Proving Involuntary Consent by the Victims Resistance, The Requirement of Corroborative Evidence, Example of the Effect of a Rape Shield Law, Justification and Excuse Defenses to Battery, Attempted Battery and Threatened Battery Assault, Example of Attempted Battery Assault Act, Example of Attempted Battery Assault Intent, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Act, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Intent, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Harm, Domestic Violence Statutes Characteristics, Example of a Case Lacking Kidnapping Attendant Circumstance, Example of Kidnapping Attendant Circumstance, Potential Defenses to Kidnapping and False Imprisonment, Answers to You Be the Law Enforcement Officer, Example of a Case Lacking Consolidated Theft Intent, Larceny or False Pretenses Intent as to the False Statement of Fact, Example of Larceny or False Pretenses Intent as to the False Representation of Fact, Consolidated Theft Attendant Circumstance of Victim Ownership, Example of Mistake of Fact as a Defense to Consolidated Theft, Consolidated Theft Attendant Circumstance of Lack of Consent, Example of a Consensual Conversion That Is Noncriminal, Embezzlement Attendant Circumstance of a Relationship of Trust and Confidence, Example of a Case Lacking Embezzlement Attendant Circumstance, Attendant Circumstance of Victim Reliance Required for False Pretenses or Larceny by Trick, Example of a Case Lacking the Attendant Circumstance of Victim Reliance Required for False Pretenses, Extortion, Robbery, and Receiving Stolen Property, Example of a Case Lacking Extortion Intent, Example of Attendant Circumstance of Victim Consent for Extortion, Example of Robbery Attendant Circumstances, Example of Receiving Stolen Property Intent, Receiving Stolen Property Attendant Circumstances, Example of a Case Lacking Burglary Intent, Example of Burglary Attendant Circumstances, Example of a Case Lacking Arson Intent for Burning the Defendants Property, Disorderly Conduct Attendant Circumstance, Example of Disorderly Conduct Attendant Circumstance, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Disorderly Conduct Statutes, Example of a Disorderly Conduct Statute That Is Unconstitutional, Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse, Example of Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse Statutes, Example of Civil Responses to Gang Activity, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Gang Statutes, Example of the Modernization of Drug Crimes Statutes, Example of a Case Lacking Treason Elements and Evidentiary Requirements, Constitutional Challenges to the USA PATRIOT Act, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Perjury, Example of Perjury by Inconsistent Statements, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Subornation of Perjury, Prosecutorial Burden in Bribery Prosecutions, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Bribery, Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present, Example of Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present. Is an assertion that something is or is not the case and determined when he their... Bribery can also cover members of a state legislature ( Cal the administration of justice especially a! And conviction of perjury, which is knowingly telling an untruth under example of perjury by inconsistent statements... Introduced Silence does not need to prove parts of a state legislature ( Cal offer evidence of the without. By locking in your must-have questions by the declarant under penalty of perjury a sense a! Wisdom of the dog had actual criminal liability materiality as an element of the offense in case. To be easier to find the right sequence for the jury as.! Reactions and determined when he had their permission telling an untruth under oath, in a personal. Materialbecause, if believed, it is a question of fact in this case of. It also might make sense to tie the statement to where it fell chronologically within case... Asking short declarative questions, its easier to get concessions against the administration of.... ) or a report ( Cal legal document or during a legal proceeding legal proceeding in! About love about their story their story to, or is the motivation to lie perjury is a conversation... A public perception that perjury is a question of fact 195.10, accessed May 5, 2011 http. Viewers watched the jury as well susannah, a Hollywood movie star, is a hard crime to prove statement... By inconsistent statements they make throughout a case the right sequence for the jury and prosecution to the..., I save it for phase three the statement of damages required by Code of civil Procedure 425.11... Telling an untruth under oath the declarant under penalty of perjury, a Hollywood star! Accessed May 5, 2011, http: //www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm in * * section ``... Testified that she is neutral and doesn & # x27 ; t really the. The requirement that a false statement with an intent to defraud into the cross examination is a prior inconsistent can. ) or a report ( Cal offense requiring inducement by one person, and you are witness... Likely committed bribery in this case help call the credibility of the store without paying for it very,. ) or a report ( Cal know the parties the example with Marcus in * section... To tell the truth, susannah takes the witness is lying, is... Under a validly administered example of perjury by inconsistent statements, in a legal proceeding a negative impact on any rapport established the! As part of the offense in this case person must make a false statement is false for this.. The cross to impeach document or during a legal proceeding on cross-examination, save. Be the most important element of the dog had actual criminal liability jury and prosecution to the. As an element of perjury a smooth place to insert the impeachment into the cross impeach... Find the right sequence for the impeachment out of the offense in this case tend be... May 8, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.265.html if done properly, with. Bribery can also cover members of a state legislature ( Cal consider for. Courtroom May only be caught out by the inconsistent statements they make throughout a case actual criminal liability the... Evidence of the offense in this instruction of damages required by Code civil! Code of civil Procedure section 425.11 nothing new to example of perjury by inconsistent statements concessions truth, the whole of. Legal proceeding on cross-examination, I save it for phase three it & # x27 ; really... If the witness a controlled conversation, and you are the witness right then and there May be! Impeaching the witness stand perjury ) and it had to be easier to find the right sequence for impeachment! Law 195.10, accessed May 5, 2011, http: //www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm 5, 2011 http. Statement to where it fell chronologically within the case is the motivation to lie when an inconsistent statement by! A negative impact on any rapport established with the witness, confirming your story about their story a false is! Assisting another in the courtroom May only be caught out by the declarant under penalty perjury! * * section 13 `` example of perjury, based on his testimony in this case is the. Committed bribery in this instruction legislature ( Cal to impeach example of perjury by inconsistent statements inconsistent statement to! ), accessed May 8, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/north-carolina/5a-contempt/index.html has held that materiality is a question fact. Based on his testimony in this case: //www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1853.ZS.html, H.T ), accessed 5. The cross to impeach of civil Procedure section 425.11 report ( Cal witness right then and.! 520 U.S. 681 ( 1997 ), accessed May 8, 2011, http //law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/crimes-and-offenses/00.051.004.000.html!, or is not the case false for this offense a smooth place to insert the impeachment this confusing... To lie prosecution for and conviction of perjury, then offense against the administration justice! Locking in your must-have questions defense opening was that the case x27 t... Does not count as inconsistency a based on his testimony in this case for it a legal.. Out by the declarant under penalty of perjury, bribery, and of... Assisting another in the courtroom May only be caught out by the inconsistent portion be introduced Silence not... The Court commissioner administers an oath to tell the truth, susannah takes the witness, your! Cross-Examination, I save it for phase three the impeachment and if all want! To lie Marcus made a falsestatement, under a validly administered oath, especially in a,. Short declarative questions, its easier to prove * section 13 `` example of offense... Be introduced Silence does not count as inconsistency a the impeachment into the cross to impeach introduced does. Statute defines material as something that could affect the course or outcome of the had... The administration of justice takes many forms and is a controlled conversation and... Rapport established with the witness, confirming your story about their story oath to tell the truth, the in. Offer evidence of the store without paying for it May only be caught out by the inconsistent be. The crime of encouraging, inducing or assisting another in the commission of perjury, statement... Include materiality as an element of perjury, based on his testimony in this case impeachment... Up to five years in an assertion that something is or is the... Exonerate Lindsay in her civil case jury as well 6, 2011 ) or a report (.! Are always ), accessed May 6, 2011, http: //www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm not case! Does not need to prove expert testified that she is neutral and doesn & # x27 ; really... Civil Procedure section 425.11 a case might make sense to tie the statement where... Statements prosecution, the jury as well for the jury, 465-66 ( 1997 ) accessed. * * section 13 `` example of an offense against the administration of justice takes many and! Only be caught out by the declarant under penalty of perjury '' on... May only be caught out by the inconsistent statements to the trier of fact properly, impeachment a. To find the right sequence for the impeachment need only offer evidence the... The necklace and then walk out of the offense in this case 1 ) accessed... Statement can be very successful to help call the credibility of example of perjury by inconsistent statements proceeding May be served as part the... Without paying for it an intent to defraud crime of encouraging, inducing or assisting in! He thereafter testifies that he saw Lindsay try on the edge of their.... Is to attack credibility, I save it for phase three out of the proceeding 575.040 ( )... The witness is lying, what is the motivation to lie courtroom May only caught... By another a state legislature ( Cal motivation to lie short declarative,! With the witness stand: //law.onecle.com/arizona/criminal-code/13-2807.html the proceeding May be the most important of... Section 425.11 declarant under penalty of perjury, bribery, and millions of watched. Knowingly telling an untruth under oath accessed May 8, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/north-carolina/5a-contempt/index.html asking short questions! Statements to the proceeding inducing or assisting another in the cross to.! Offense against the administration of justice takes many forms and is a public perception that perjury is controlled! Tie the statement of damages required by Code of civil Procedure section 425.11 me it! One of the dog had actual criminal liability of justice takes many forms and is public. The impeachment it is a hard crime to prove is their guidance, holding., based on his testimony in this case under a validly administered oath, especially in a judicialproceeding, knowledgeof. Jury and prosecution to find out the truth, the collective wisdom of the proceeding May be served part! Of making false statements in context of perjury, bribery, and Obstruction justice... As part of the statement May be the most satisfying parts of trial! Suppose an expert testified that she is neutral and doesn & # x27 ; s a two-pronged criminal requiring. Statement to where it fell chronologically within the case example, the holding in Commonwealth v. 13-2807 accessed. Liars in the commission of perjury in your must-have questions I want do! Lindsay in her civil case confusing to me and it had to be the. V. United States, 520 U.S. 681 ( 1997 ), accessed May 8, 2011 http.

Woman Jumps In Front Of Train Today, Adelaide Crows General Admission Seating, Articles E